Order SOCW 6121 Week 11 The Ending Stage and Evaluation essay paper help
SOCW 6121 Week 11 The Ending Stage and Evaluation essay assignment
The ending stage of a group is just as important as the beginning stage. Effective termination is an important part of the therapeutic process and an expectation of the NASW Code of Ethics (1996). Some members of the group may need further therapy or services, and it is the responsibility of the clinical social worker to assess every member’s needs. Also, the members should feel that some type of closure has occurred, and this is often done through ending exercises. These exercises help the members of the group say goodbye to one another and acknowledge the group’s accomplishments. Another important part of the ending stage is the evaluation of the group intervention. The NASW Code of Ethics (1996) requires that some type of evaluation method is implemented in clinical practice. The social worker should evaluate the group’s goals and the level of success of the group process.
Kindly place your order right now for a plagiarism-free, custom-written essay assignment that is absolutely original on SOCW 6121 Week 11 The Ending Stage and Evaluation done by our best nursing writers
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Analyze termination process with families and groups
- Evaluate appraisal methods for group process
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Chapter 13, “Ending the Group’s Work” (pp. 395-416)
Chapter 14, “Evaluation” (pp. 417-443)
Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Social work case studies: Concentration year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing [Vital Source e-reader].
“Working With Organizations: The Southeast Planning Group” (pp. 51–52)
London, M. (2007). Performance appraisal for groups: Models and methods for assessing group processes and outcomes for development and evaluation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59(3), 175–188.
Discussion: Termination with Families and Group
Intervention endings are a critical part of social work practice. Because endings may create strong emotional reactions, the termination process starts from the first session. Successfully terminating family sessions or group sessions promotes learning for clients to take with them moving forward.
By Day 3
Post a comparison of the termination process between treatment groups and family sessions. Explain how you would evaluate readiness to terminate group and family treatment, identifying similarities and differences between the evaluation of the two types of treatment. Describe the techniques you would use to terminate a treatment group and how these may be the same or different than the techniques you would use to terminate a family intervention.
response 1
Darrell Morris RE: Discussion
Termination is the final stage of counseling that marks the close of the therapeutic alliance. For the last interaction to be successful, the counselor must look at creating a good impression so that the counselee may associate the experience as a multiplying effect of improvement as their time is well spent. Termination is experienced only when the goals are reached, and specified working time has ended. Besides, termination also involves a follow-up program that is made to ensure that counseling clients have been able to adapt to a new living style as stability and wellbeing is guaranteed (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014).
According to London (2007), assessing the group’s members through their reactions, behaviors, and performance help counselors to identify the ultimate time to terminate the therapeutic sessions. On the other hand, terminating a family treatment can only be done when the goal has been achieved and that counselees have attained stability.
One of the similarities of the two types of treatment is that terminations are done when progress has been made to assist the care seekers in returning to their initial wellbeing before the problem occurred. On the contrary, the family sessions are different from treatment groups as it involves altering the interactions between or among family members to improve the functionality of the family. Family sessions are aimed at providing therapies that solve problems that need changing or adjusting rather than viewing the problem as residing on a particular person. Besides, group counseling is done to assist in developing skills (Toseland & Rivas, 2017).
Closing a group or terminating a counseling session is critical to all individuals in any setting; however, examining the extent and the readiness to discontinue group treatment is complex. This is because the termination of groups is often evaluated through assessing the progress towards goal achievement. Unlike treatment groups, observation techniques can be utilized in family sessions as their cohesiveness to settle their differences for more exceptional outcomes can be easily analyzed.
References
London, M. (2007). Performance appraisal for groups: Models and methods for assessing group processes and outcomes for development and evaluation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59(3), 175–188.
Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Social work case studies: Concentration year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing [Vital Source e-reader].
Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2017). An introduction to group work practice (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
