Picot Paper Rough Draft

Picot Paper Rough Draft Essay Assignment Paper

Details:

Use the practice problem and a qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

Research Critique Guidelines To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment andthe quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the studyin your responses. Qualitative Study Background of Study: • Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes?This gap in knowledge is the research problem. • How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. • Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. • List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. • Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Method of Study: • Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions? • Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it? • Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include? • Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.

Picot Paper Rough Draft Essay

• Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies? • Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? • When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings? © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Results of Study • What were the study findings? • What are the implications to nursing? • Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing? Ethical Considerations • Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? • Was patient privacy protected? • Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion • Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement. • Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. • Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. • Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. 2 Quantitative Study Background of Study: • Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes?This gap in knowledge is the research problem. • How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. • Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. • List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers. • Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Methods of Study • Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify? • Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants? • Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study? • Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted? • Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables? • How were data collected in this study? • What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method? • Identify the time period for data collection of the study. • Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant. • Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study. • Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis? • What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses? Results of Study • What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings? 3 • Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings? • What limitations of the study were identified by researchers? • Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings? • What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findingsof the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing? • What suggestions are made for further studies? Ethical Considerations • Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? • Was patient privacy protected? • Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of? Conclusion • Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement. • Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice. • Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. • Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. Reference Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011).Understanding nursing research(5thed.).St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. 4 Running head:

Picot Paper Rough Draft Essay

NURSING PROJECT: PICOT RESEARCH QUESTION Nursing Project: PICOT Research Question Priscilla Obrer NRS-433V 09/16/2018 1 NURSING PROJECT: PICOT RESEARCH QUESTION 2 Nursing Project: PICOT Research Question Research question The proposed research question is: “Does the combined treatment of chemotherapy and limb surgery improve the health and psychological outcomes in 5-year survivors of children diagnosed with high-grade osteosarcoma as compared to extensive limb amputation surgery?” Population: Children diagnosed with localized high-grade osteosarcoma Intervention: Combination of chemotherapy and limb salvage surgery Comparison: Compared survival rate and psychological effects of extensive massive and limb amputation surgery Outcome: Patients undergoing a combined chemotherapy-limb salvage surgery treatment of high-grade localized osteosarcoma show a better prognosis and lower psychological stress than amputees. Time: Follow up five years or more after treatment NURSING PROJECT: PICOT RESEARCH QUESTION 3 References Anninga, J. K., Gelderblom, H., Fiocco, M., Kroep, J. R., Taminiau, A. H., Hogendoorn, P. C., & Egeler, R. M. (2011). Chemotherapeutic adjuvant treatment for osteosarcoma: where do we stand?. European journal of cancer, 47(16), 2431-2445. Abstract: Genlin, C., Jinying, C., Xuan, Y., & Pinquan, S. (2003). Treatment of osteosarcoma in children. Journal of Clinical Orthopedics, 2, 023. NURSING PROJECT: PICOT RESEARCH QUESTION Lewis, J. J., Leung, D., Casper, E. S., Woodruff, J., Hajdu, S. I., & Brennan, M. F. (1999). Multifactorial analysis of long-term follow-up (more than 5 years) of primary extremity sarcoma. Archives of Surgery, 134(2), 190-194. Robert, R. S., Ottaviani, G., Huh, W. W., Palla, S., & Jaffe, N. (2010). Psychosocial and functional outcomes in long‐term survivors of osteosarcoma: A comparison of limb‐ salvage surgery and amputation. Pediatric blood & cancer, 54(7), 990-999. 4 NURSING PROJECT: PICOT RESEARCH QUESTION 5 Sun, L., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Li, H., Li, B., & Ye, Z. (2015). Prognostic value of pathologic fracture in patients with high grade localized osteosarcoma: A systemic review and meta‐analysis of cohort studies. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 33(1), 131-139. NURSING PROJECT: PICOT RESEARCH QUESTION Wang, W. G., Wan, C., & Liao, G. J. (2015). The efficacy of high-dose versus moderate-dose chemotherapy in treating osteosarcoma: a systematic review and metaanalysis. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine