Order HAD509 Week 2 Pineridge Quality Alliance Case Study essay paper help
HAD509 Week 2 Pineridge Quality Alliance Case Study essay assignment
Pineridge Quality Alliance is a study in clinical integration, accountable care organizations, and population health. The case study profiles the history, challenges, and opportunities related to development of a clinically integrated network and the sponsoring organization’s quest to become an accountable care organization and engage in population health.
Kindly place your order right now for a plagiarism-free, custom-written essay assignment that is absolutely original on HAD509 Week 2 Pineridge Quality Alliance Case Study done by our best nursing writers
[Adapted from: Simendinger, E. (2003). In Search of a Course Design and Teaching Methods to Improve Critical Thinking. Journal of Health Administration Education, 20(3), 197-213.]
Do each case analysis without discussing it with other HAD 509 students prior to the due date.
For each case, write the following information and number it 1 though 8 and use section headings:
- Your name.
- The case number, case title, and class date.
- A summary of the case. [1 paragraph] This will require you to read the case several times. Do not just copy sentences from the case. Instead, express in your own words the essence of the case.
- A list of what you think are the 10-15 most important facts/factors in the case [1-2 pages].
- The most important health administration problem/issue to be solved in the case. [1 sentence].
List other secondary problems in the case [1-2 pages].
- Your recommended solution for the case (a.-d. below). Make clear specific realistic recommendations. There must be a clear logical sequence to your thoughts and recommendations. [4-5 pages]
- At least three possible realistic alternative solutions for the most important problem (stated above for 5).
- Criteria to evaluate possible alternative solutions. For example: acceptability to stakeholders, needed resources, legality, timing, cost-effectiveness, ability to implement, side effects, qualifications, statistical data, financial data, ethical considerations, fit with case facts, likelihood of actually solving the problem, etc.
- Evaluation of the possible alternative solutions (6a) using the criteria (6b).
- Your recommended solution for the problem, based on 6a, 6b, and 6c. Justify your recommendation.
- Specific MHA tools, methods, techniques, principles, theories, models, etc. from MHA courses that you used for this case. List specific tools (e.g., cost-benefit analysis, market segmentation, etc.). Do not list general subjects (e.g., finance, leadership) [1-2 pages].
Answer any case study questions that accompany the case. If a case question is answered by what you already wrote for 3-7 above, then just note which part of your case analysis provides the answer.
